Brain Science -- How Can It Help An Organization Succeed?

Just this past week, Christianna Hayes published an innovative new book entitled Wired for Excellence: Harnessing Brain Science for Organizational Success, which brings together the fascinating world of neuroscience with the practical tools of organizational excellence, giving leaders a fresh, science-backed way to build thriving workplaces. Essentially, it’s a real-world guide to understanding how the brain shapes behavior, decisions, and culture, and how leaders can use that insight to drive performance, trust, and long-term success.

When I spoke with Christianna recently, I asked her, "How can brain science actually help an organization succeed?" Here is her complete answer:

When organizations talk about improvement, they often focus on tools and processes. But those systems succeed or fail based on one thing -- the human brain. Every decision, reaction, and relationship runs through that three-pound organ we all bring to work each day. When leaders understand how it functions, they can design environments that bring out people’s best thinking instead of triggering defense mechanisms.

When people experience uncertainty or unclear expectations, the brain’s alarm system -- the amygdala-- interprets that as a threat. Energy shifts from problem-solving to self-protection, and engagement drops. The solution isn’t to push harder; it’s to design clarity, safety, and progress into the work itself. When the brain perceives purpose and predictability, it releases dopamine and oxytocin -- chemicals that reinforce focus, trust, and motivation. In other words, success happens when people’s brains feel safe enough to contribute and rewarded enough to keep going.

In Wired for Excellence, I use a framework called the BRAIN Model -- Belonging, Resilience, Autonomy, Insight, and Nurturing -- to help leaders translate neuroscience into daily practice. These five elements remind us what the brain needs to stay engaged. When organizations meet those needs, performance isn’t forced -- it flows.

As I often tell clients, “The brain is both the barrier and the breakthrough.” Once we learn to work with it rather than against it, excellence becomes less about control and more about design.

What do you think of Christianna's perspective? Is "brain science" a consideration in your organization when process-improvement initiatives are implemented? Do you think it could affect the overall workplace culture? 

Change Management and Continuous Improvement -- Is There a Disconnect Between the Two?

This past month, Kyle B. Stone published an interesting book entitled The Change Agent’s Field Guide: Mastering the Intersections of Change Management and Continuous Improvement, which helps anyone involved in leading continuous improvement within an organization better understand when to apply the change management techniques necessary to achieve successful outcomes. Many continuous improvement efforts fail because those leading changes do not recognize when to pause and evaluate critical intersections needing change management tools. This book provides clear guidance on when to pause, what to do, and how to navigate these intersections successfully.

When I spoke with Kyle this month, I asked him, "Why is there a disconnect between change management and continuous improvement?” Here is his detailed answer:

My premise on why continuous improvement efforts sometimes “stick” and other times do not is that many leaders of these efforts fail to understand the importance of change management and the critical intersections between people and process improvement.  My desire with this book is to offer a guide for leaders of continuous improvement and how to anticipate, manage, and measure change while engaging in continuous improvement. There are seven intersections that I describe that help close the disconnect between change management and continuous improvement.

1. Develop systems thinking skills
2. Triage Change
3. Make a plan
4. Manage the handoffs
5. Communication
6. Counselor
7. Political engagements and interactions

Managing these critical intersections is key to successful outcomes for planned or unplanned change initiatives. My intent is not to address all the various types of externally managed continuous improvement methodologies since most externally managed “accreditations” are based on alignment with standards generally designed to drive continuous improvement within the organization. The goal of this book is to provide a foundation of knowledge in both change management and typical continuous improvement methods so leaders of change can navigate the nuances and triage the challenges typically encountered whenever you are asking people to change the way they perform their work, which is a common outcome of most continuous improvement efforts. 

Following the foundation-building chapters, examples of how to identify and manage the intersections between those affected by change and the continuous improvement efforts are provided, assisting the leaders with anticipating and addressing critical junctures. Ignoring these intersections and plowing forward is a common failure during many continuous improvement efforts, often resulting in a lack of engagement, resistance, and sometimes sabotage. 

What do you think of Kyle's perspective on the relationship between continuous improvement initiatives and change management? For those who have led Lean and continuous improvement efforts in your organization, how was change management addressed? Did it improve buy-in and understanding among colleagues? 

"Elemental" Leaders -- Can They Benefit Your Organization?

Last week, Tyler Comeau released his new book, The Elemental Leader: Unlocking Your Potential Through Values, Perseverance, Adaptability, and Innovation. This comprehensive leadership development guide reimagines the classical elements -- Earth, Air, Water, and Fire -- as metaphors for foundational leadership principles. Designed to help leaders unlock their full potential, the book grounds leadership practices in these elemental concepts:

• Earth represents core values and a grounded mindset.

• Air symbolizes perseverance and the ability to overcome adversity.

• Water reflects adaptability and skillful navigation of change.

• Fire embodies innovation, motivation, decision-making, and risk-taking.

Through a blend of personal anecdotes, case studies, research, and actionable strategies, Comeau offers a holistic framework for leadership growth that is both practical and inspiring.

When I spoke with Tyler this week, I asked him, “What are elemental leaders, and how do they benefit organizations?” He began by sharing this passage from his book and then distilled his thoughts:

“As you ignite this journey, remember that the most effective leaders are not those who rigidly adhere to a set of rules but those who are adaptable, resilient, and open to new ideas. They are the ones who dare to take risks, learn from their mistakes, and constantly evolve their practice. They are the elemental leaders, the ones who understand that leadership is not just about imparting knowledge but about igniting a spark within each colleague that will burn brightly for a lifetime.”

At its core, elemental leadership is about cultivating versatile, grounded, and deeply human leaders. These individuals:

• Create organizations where values are not just words on a wall but active guides for decision-making (Earth). 

• Foster cultures that treat setbacks as opportunities for growth (Air).

• Lead teams through transitions with openness and flexibility (Water).

• Embrace bold opportunities and calculated risks (Fire).

Organizations benefit from elemental leaders because they model wholeness rather than rigidity. Rather than relying on a single leadership style, they bring a dynamic toolkit that adapts to diverse challenges. This versatility fosters trust, strengthens workplace culture, and sustains long-term momentum.

In a world defined by complexity and constant change, elemental leaders don’t just endure -- they empower their organizations to thrive.

What are your thoughts on Tyler’s approach? Does your organization cultivate leadership that enhances engagement and builds a resilient, values-driven culture?

Kurt Lewin's Change Model -- Does It Benefit Businesses?

In July of this year, Gilmore Crosby published a new book titled Leadership and the Frontline Workforce: Lessons from the Targets of Change. The book explores methods of organizational change through the real-life experiences of frontline workers. While leadership and management theory have traditionally been written from the top down, Crosby highlights a notable exception: Kurt Lewin, whose action-research demonstrated that those on the frontlines are often best positioned to initiate and sustain meaningful change.

Through a series of interviews, the book captures the voices of workers who lived through Lewin-style transformations -- before, during, and after the change process. Their stories reveal the full spectrum of experience: the good, the bad, and the often-overlooked challenges of being the targets of change within complex systems.

When I spoke with Gilmore in August, I asked him, “What is Kurt Lewin-style change and how does it benefit a business?" Here is his complete answer:

As noted in the book, Kurt Lewin’s change model is in many ways simple and often misunderstood. It begins with the simple premise that everyone wants to influence the systems they are in, at work and outside of work.

Lewin conducted simple research to test his theories. With group after group, he demonstrated that when people were told what to do without any chance to influence, they were less likely to do it, or if they did it, less likely to do it well.”

The book goes on to give examples of Lewin’s work, including when the government wanted farmers to irrigate differently during the Dust Bowl years.

The farmers who were simply lectured at did almost none of what was suggested. The farmers who engaged in group dialogue, who were genuinely allowed to influence, and who thought about their own solutions, implemented a high percentage of what they came up with. The same results occurred in all of Lewin’s studies, including with workers in an industrial setting.

The results of his studies were and continue to be groundbreaking. When people come up with their own solutions, they are far more likely to be committed to them.

The consistent result is higher morale and productivity. The book illustrates how, through interviews with executives and with hourly workers who went through change efforts led by me, my father, and my colleagues. The interviews bring to life conditions before, during, and after such a change. The methods can be applied to any organization and to society. 

In a nutshell, most leaders and consultants try to do most of the thinking. They fail to tap the knowledge and pride of the people who are actually doing the hands-on work. Furthermore, because they over-function in terms of thinking, leadership is further handicapped by the dilemma of handing off, imposing, or selling their solutions to the organization. The entire approach is a huge mistake, resulting in crappy implementation of potentially effective solutions, tension, blame, and low morale. This book teaches a better way.

What are your thoughts on Gilmore’s perspective? Are the leaders and managers in your organization familiar with Kurt Lewin’s change management methods? Do frontline employees have meaningful channels to share their insights and suggestions for process improvement?

Can Lean, Blockchain, and Systems Thinking Be Combined?

Back in June,  Machiel Tesser co-authored and published a book entitled Lean Blockchain Systems Thinking: Reinventing Value Streams with John Dennis. This book shows that blockchain, together with Lean and Systems Thinking, can provide multiple advantages for societies and the environment and can be used effectively to meet sustainable development goals (SDGs).

When I spoke with Machiel in July, I asked him: “What are the benefits of combining Lean, Blockchain, and Systems Thinking?" Here is his complete answer:

Blockchain and Lean: Building the Lean Internet

Blockchain and Lean are a match made for the modern era, creating a Lean Internet. Where Lean empowers us to eliminate waste and streamline value, blockchain goes a step further: it prevents waste before it even arises.

Lean lays out the philosophy and methodology, while blockchain delivers the digital toolkit: digital identities, verifiable credentials, automated rules, workflows, and consensus on standards. This makes processes instantly verifiable, compliant with regulations, and building blocks for an intention economy.

What was once theoretical is now tangible: in the U.S., the GENIUS Act is shaping a robust framework for stablecoin issuance and programmable finance. In the EU, MiCA and eIDAS 2 have come into full force (since December 2024), providing regulatory guardrails for digital assets and trusted digital identities.

Now, blockchain and crypto aren’t speculation or hype; they’re legally programmable and digitally enforceable.

Lean workflows in Real-Time

Workflows become pull-based and real-time, backed by quality proofs from the source, just like Lean Kanban: only what’s needed, when it’s needed. Smart contracts automate verification and trigger actions instantly, eliminating manual or paper processes, reducing errors, carbon emissions, and admin overhead.

Continuous, Network-Wide Improvement

Direct feedback loops and transparency cultivate a shared understanding of the network’s intent. It brings stakeholders onto the same page who are willing to improve the system rather than just their own parts. 

Identifying and solving problems together aligns perfectly with the continuous improvement ethos of Lean. By making performance and objectives visible, stakeholders can respond quickly and collaboratively, making progress proactive rather than reactive.

By targeting root causes, not just symptoms, and listening to every voice across the network, this approach shifts us from reactive fixes to proactive systems design. It’s an inclusive, holistic transformation: the true promise of a Lean, a programmable internet, reinventing value streams.

Do you agree with Machiel's perspective? Has blockchain been integrated into your Lean initiative? If so, what have been the results?

Servant Leadership -- How Does It Help Achieve Organizational Excellence?

At the end of May, Robert. B Camp published a book entitled The Servant Leader: How to Create a Productive Organization By Serving Those Being Led -- a compelling exploration of servant leadership in practice. The book delves into how truly effective leaders prioritize humility, foster growth in others, and remove obstacles to enable success. A servant leader, Camp asserts, sets the vision and paves the way for others to follow.

When I spoke with Robert this month, I asked him: "What is 'servant leadership,' and how does it benefit an organization?" Here is his complete response: 

Lean is about leadership.  

When employed effectively, Lean works from the top of the organization down.  While conventional "command and control" leadership can get a Lean transformation off the ground, it can’t sustain one.  Sustainable Lean is achieved when leaders set direction and goals, then use their authority to remove obstacles from the paths of the people they hold accountable for achieving those things.  This demands a mindset shift: leaders must see themselves not above, but in service to, their teams.

In this upside-down way of looking at leadership, one realizes that leadership isn’t about power and control.  It’s about clearing the path for one’s subordinates so that they can do their jobs more effectively and excel.

Early in my book, the reader meets Thomas Harding, a director endeavoring to be a servant leader.  We learn that, as a leader, “Thomas feels his highest calling [is] to grow those below him; to prepare them to be the best they possibly [can be].  As a result, he [is] far more worried about his people’s careers than his own.”  

The reader also learns that Thomas adheres to a strict hierarchy of principles:

• His priorities are: 
• Morality (following a moral code)
• Organization (achieving the best outcome for his company)
• Subordinates (clearing their paths so his people can shine)
• Self (Striving to be his best in service of others)
• He always completes assignments, but often well beyond expectations.
• He seeks to make his people’s lives easier by eliminating bureaucratic obstacles.
• He listens to his people, but also communicates what’s going on.
• He strives to develop subordinate leaders who mirror his own behaviors. 

Robert’s perspective invites reflection -- What do you think of his view of servant leadership? Is servant leadership part of your organization's culture? Is it part of your Lean initiative? 

Professional Development and Training -- What is Changing?

Just this past week, Matteo Zaralli published a new book entitled The Evolution of Professional Training: How Artificial Intelligence Technologies Can Accelerate the Learning, which is a prime resource for navigating the evolution of education and professional training in the age of artificial intelligence (AI) and virtual reality. It thoroughly explores how AI can enhance human capabilities, facilitate more efficient and personalized learning or training, and promote unprecedented professional development. This book is not just an analysis of the impact of emerging technologies on learning and professional development -- it is an invitation to reflect on the future of work, the nature of intelligence, and the evolution of human society in the digital age.

When I spoke with Matteo recently, I asked him, “What is now having the biggest impact on professional development and training?" Here is his complete answer:

The biggest force currently reshaping professional development and training is the match of artificial intelligence (AI) and virtual reality (VR). These technologies are redefining not only how we learn, but also how we interact with knowledge, work, and each other.

As outlined in my book, we are experiencing a new digital revolution. AI plays a central role in transforming training into a personalized and adaptive experience. By leveraging data, AI systems can identify learning needs and adjust content in real time, offering highly efficient, user-specific development paths.

Meanwhile, virtual reality introduces a new dimension to learning: experience. In VR, users can simulate real-world scenarios, such as public speaking, decision-making, or technical tasks, in safe and immersive environments. This not only accelerates skill acquisition but also increases confidence and retention.

Together, AI and VR support the rise of the augmented worker: professionals empowered, not replaced, by technology. They allow faster learning, deeper engagement, and more relevant training across sectors.

However, this transformation goes beyond tools. It requires reflection on the nature of intelligence and the future of work. As discussed in the book’s philosophical section, we must consider how AI reshapes our perception of truth and identity, and how digital environments challenge our ethical frameworks.

In this context, the impact of AI and VR is both technical and cultural. They demand a shift from static, one-size-fits-all education models to dynamic, human-machine collaboration. Professional training is becoming more immersive, flexible, and continuous, an ongoing process rather than a fixed phase.

Those who embrace this shift will stay competitive and be prepared to navigate the complexities of a fast-changing world.

What do you think of Matteo's perspective? Have new technologies affected or transformed professional training in your organization? If so, what are the results so far?

Healthcare Executives and the Mistakes They Make Regarding Decision-Making and Leadership

In April, Linda Henman and Deborah Perkins published a book entitled Healthy Decisions: Critical Thinking Skills for Healthcare Executives, which challenges the status quo, arguing that the success of healthcare organizations hinges not on abstract concepts like "culture" but on the concrete decisions executives make. Drawing from real-world experience with large systems like Mercy and Banner Health, specialty hospitals like Ranken Jordan Pediatric Bridge Hospital, insurance companies like Blue Cross Blue Shield, and nonprofit elder care systems, the authors provide a practical guide to help healthcare executives make the tough decisions they can’t afford to get wrong.

When I spoke with Linda this month, I asked her: "What are the biggest mistakes healthcare executives make regarding decision-making and leadership?" Here is her complete answer:

The single most catastrophic—and astonishingly common—mistake healthcare executives make is undervaluing their workforce. Not on paper, of course. On paper, they wax poetic about people being their greatest asset. In practice, they slash staffing, ignore burnout, and treat frontline engagement as optional.

Let’s look at the wreckage.

Hahnemann University Hospital collapsed under its own weight in 2019. Leaders gutted staffing and fiddled with spreadsheets while credibility—and then patients—walked out the door. This resulted in a full shutdown in a city that needed that hospital.

Ascension Health, one of the largest systems in the country, thought it could cut its way to profitability. That meant layoffs and razor-thin staffing, even in clinical settings. They didn’t get the results they intended. Instead, the decision caused lawsuits, strikes, and a shattered reputation.

Providence faced strikes and the massive exit of nurses because executives didn’t listen. Executives suspected burnout, but they ignored the warnings for too long. Travel nurse overreliance, plummeting morale, and public embarrassment resulted.

Even public systems like NYC Health + Hospitals remain hamstrung by hiring delays and morale freefall. If you can’t staff behavioral health in New York City, you don’t have a workforce problem; you have a leadership problem.

And then there’s MetroHealth, where the headlines address lawsuits, not life-saving care. When the executive team implodes, culture does too.

Some of these organizations have changed leadership and slowly started the recovery process, but others never will. In turbulent times, no one will recover from hiring mistakes, inaccurate strategic focus, or underdeveloped succession planning.

Executives don’t create culture at a board retreat. Culture forms when executives use advanced critical thinking skills to solve problems they’ve never faced before. They must first start by seeing their workforce not as overhead but as a leverage point. Underinvest there, and you’re not saving money—you’re setting a match to your margins.

Start with the best people delivering the best care. Ignore that, and you’ll join the list above—not as a cautionary tale, but as a case study in how to lose an empire by winning a spreadsheet.

What do you think of Linda's perspective? Do you agree with her regarding the mistakes made by these health providers? Have you worked in organizations that have made these mistakes?

The Toyota Production System (TPS) -- What Are the Misconceptions?

Earlier this month, Sarah K. Womack published a very interesting new book entitled Toyota's Improvement Thinking from the Inside: From Personal Transformation to Organizational Transformation, which describes how Toyota, through its coaches and leaders, develops its members’ capabilities through a series of continuous improvement (kaizen and problem-solving) activities. For many members of Toyota, this process results in a personal transformation that ultimately leads to organizational transformation.

When I spoke with Sarah this past week, I asked her: "What are the biggest misconceptions about Toyota’s continuous improvement methods and management system?” Here is her complete response:

The biggest misconception I personally had about Toyota’s continuous improvement methods and management system was a degree of personal development and deliberate challenge required to learn how to improve.  It was a journey of mastery of improvement tools, business needs, and how to work with members of your team to accomplish daily objectives.  For most members, that mastery was deeply personal and demanded humility and continuous reflection to transform our mindsets.  And, while there was some talk about Toyota’s philosophy of respect for people, respect is a social construct and difficult to understand from outside of the group.  Once I was inside, I saw how much emphasis there was on reducing team member burden towards the end of reducing waste and creating value for customers. 

More generally speaking of the field, I find many misconceptions about how the entire system works together.  Organizations tend to over-emphasize or de-emphasize the Toyota Production System (TPS) tools for improvement when a successful approach lands at a healthy balance.  The TPS tools are good entry points for people development and continuous improvement.  Value stream mapping, for example, is a tool to chart how material and information flows within a system, show waste, and tell a kaizen story (of waste reduction).  Even if a system is not very complex, learning it through deep study then articulating that learning visually is a special skill set developed over time.  You can feel confident in your skill set when you are able to use such a tool to tell the story of your improvement work.

Finally, I would highlight the misconception around standardization.  Many organizations, within and outside of manufacturing, think it is too rigid to work successfully.  However, Toyota and others have shown that by deeply studying processes and standardizing them, continuous improvements in safety, quality, and other performance outcomes are achievable.

What do you think about Sarah's experience? Has your company implemented a Lean initiative based on the Toyota Production System? Was is transformative?

Leadership Development -- What Is Lacking?

Back in January, Geoff Ribbens, Mark Abraham, and Alistair Cumming published a new book entitled Team Leadership: How to Define, Apply, and Measure It, which presents a unique, people-centric, and scientifically researched theory of leadership linked to an accurate data-based assessment and diagnostic product. For individual leaders looking to maximize personal development and results or for organizations wanting to analyze leadership and its effects across an entire structure or business, this book redefines understanding and development.

When I spoke with the authors this month, I asked them a series of questions starting with "What is currently lacking in leadership development?" Here are their responses:

In our book, we start by identifying four major errors that have held back leadership development and understanding for many years. No doubt all of us have made some, or all, of these errors in the past.

The first error is looking at the leader to understand leadership. Eminent social psychologists have stated that this "leader-centric" approach is “deeply flawed” and not at all useful. We expand on why it is so flawed in the book. We conclude that it is much more useful to concentrate on the perception of those being led.

The second error is to assume that the term "leadership" means the same in a multitude of different contexts such as political leadership, moral leadership, organizational leadership, and team leadership. Different contexts obviously require different definitions and approaches. This is why the book concentrates on the "leadership" of teams.

The third error is to assume that "business success" equates with leadership. This approach only states what the writer hopes leadership will deliver, not what it is. It also assumes that the only people who have leadership are senior managers and CEOs.

The fourth error is simple. Nowhere in our research do we find a definition of the term ‘leadership’ that was objective and measurable.

MS: “So what is the solution to all these myths, assumptions, and lack of definition?”

All the assumptions and errors above have been solved by our innovative approach called Emergent Team Leadership (ETL). We focus on the leadership of teams, whether it is the executive team or the team on the factory floor. We show that all team leaders at every level, have the potential to have "leadership" and it is now measurable.

ETL measures the degree to which team members "willingly and enthusiastically accept their team leader." By examining how team members perceive their leader we created a 12-point profile. The profile is created by the team members, it might not be how the leader perceives themselves or is perceived by the organization. The profile is a simple radar graph and is easy to understand.

MS: “So why focus on teams and team leaders?”

The relationship between the team and the team leader is fundamental to team and organizational performance. If team members "willingly and enthusiastically accept their leader’" then the team leader is more able to deliver positive results because the team supports them. Also, team and team leader well-being is achieved, and there is less disagreement and conflict.

MS: "I can see the improved well-being of the team and team leader but are there any other benefits?

The simple 12-point profile indicates to the team leader what they need to do to move from merely managing their team to the true leadership of that team. The profile is not based on the leader’s personality but on the team’s perception. What is important is that the leader can change that perception. The leader is not a ‘servant’ of the team but can increase their influence by understanding how their team perceives them.

There are many benefits for the team, the team leader, and the whole organization. One obvious benefit is that for the first time leadership training, coaching, or appraising can be tested and retested, and progress can be measured. Our research also found that team leaders themselves found the 12-point profile powerful and relevant, more relevant than other leadership assessment processes they had experienced. If an organization uses ETL this can have a profound positive effect on the organization’s whole team leadership culture.

What do you think of the authors' (Geoff Ribbens, Mark Abraham, and Alistair Cumming) view on the current state of leadership development? Do you agree with what the authors perceive as errors and their proposed solutions?